Architectonic

I once put a lot of effort into classifying my ebooks, as follows. The boring word for this is “typology”. The exciting word is architectonic.

(I find classification satisfying, just as I find lists satisfying: one can increase meaning very greatly just by grouping and abstracting. Intellectual labour in low-gravity.)

Formal Reality

Maths

Pure

Discrete

Theoretical computer science
Crypto
Theoretical linguistics

Continuous

Analysis

Quantity

Number theory
Combinatorics
Probability

Change

Analysis

Space

Geometry Algebraic geometry
Trig Topology

Structure

Algebra
Group theory
Order theory

Applied

Stats
Information theory
Bioinformatics

Logic

Formal logic

Syllogistic
Propositional
Predicate

Mathematical logic

Set theory
Category theory
Metalogic
Proof theory
Model theory
Computability theory

Game theory

Multiplayer
Decision theory 2

Natural Reality

Physics

Mechanics

Classical

Statics
Dynamics
Kinematics

Continuum

fluid mechanics,

Relativistic

Quantum

QCD
QED
QFD

Statistical

Thermodynamics

Scales

Particle physics

Nuclear

Atomic-molecular-optical physics

Condensed matter physics

Astrophysics

Astronomy
Astrodynamics
Astrometry
Physical cosmology
Planetary science
Stellar astronomy

Chemistry

Organic
Inorganic

Biology

Evolution

Genetics

Biotechnology

Ecology

Phylogeny

Cells

Prokaryotes

Bacteria
Archaea

Eukaryotes

Plants

Animals

Sociobiology

Humans

Medicine
Physiology
Food
Biological psychology
Physical anthropology
Cultural Coevolution theory

Earth Sciences

Physical geography
Geology
Climatology

Engineering

Chemical
Civil
Electrical
Mechanical

Computer

Hardware
Software

Social Reality

Economics

Macro
Micro
Behavioural
Economic History
Econometrics
Game theory

Psychology

Emotions Developmental Positive Pathological Social Cognitive

Linguistics

Particular languages

Afro

Semitic

Uralic-Yukhaghir

Finnish
Estonian
Hungarian
Tundra
Kolyma

Austral

Gilyak

Dravidian

Altaic

Chukchi

Na-Dené

Amerindian

Kartvelian

Tai-Kadai

Indo-European

Sino-Tibetan

Eskimo-Aleut

Social sciences

Politics

Political Economy International Relations

Sociology

Criminology
Aging
Emotions
Individuality
Race
Fame
Gender
Health
Risk
Urban
Nation
Childhood
Spirituality
Family
Status
Education
Deviance
Sexuality

History

Archaeology

Prehistory

Ancient

Middle Ages

Early
High
Late

Early Modern (1450 - 1750)

Late Modern (1750 - 1918)

Modern v Postmodern (1918 - )

Historiography

Method,
Metahistory

Law

Social theory

(Cultural) Anthropology

Human Geography

Development

Psychoanalysis

Critical Theory

Art

Words

Poetry

Prose

Fiction
Nonfiction
Faction

Theatre

Sounds

Music
Opera

Visuals

Sculpture
Architecture
Costumery

Images

Painting
Photography

Motion

Dance
Film

Theory

Philosophy

Philosophy of life

Body

Society

Solutions to the Problem of Existence

Experience

Hedonism
Aestheticism
Intellectualism
Stoicism

God

Nonexistence

Anattā
Suicide

Action

Freedom
Self-invention
Morality
Posthumanism
Absurdism (laughter)

Epistemology

Cartesian
Post-cartesian
Scepticism
Enquiry
Evidence
Explanation and Understanding
Justification

Mind

Phenomenology
Objectivity
Perception
Personal identity

Reason

Pure Reason

see Formal reality

Practical Reason

see epistemology, Cognitive science, psychology, behavioural economics

Philosophy of Science

Explanation Causality Realism etc Demarcation Reduction Laws Rationality Evidence

Ethics

First-order
Metaethics
Applied

Philosophy of Language

Semantics

Metaphysics

Ontology
Truth
Identity
Causation
Time
Modality

Aesthetics

Metaphilosophy

When I was a romantic youth building my first architectonic, I put art outside social reality, in "Philosophy and Art". Now, it's true that social criticism is fine art / academic art's default purpose, and has been for a hundred years now. But I no longer think of them as outside.

If I go on this way, I'll probably stop thinking of philosophy above social reality, like a Marxist, dull and confined.
A game for one player.
This doesn't handle the inter-disciplines very well, obviously. Cognitive science is philosophy plus computer science plus psychology, for instance. And parts of the human sciences need to be substantially social.